Is a book in the hand worth two in the ether?

Perhaps you do some or all of your book reading on an electronic device like a Kindle or i-pad. Conversely you may be someone who was never tempted to go digital in your reading. Or someone who tried an e-reader for a while but then discarded it in favour of that old familiar sensation of holding a book in the hand.

IMG_3186-1_4

Most readers, even those of us who welcome the occasional convenience of e-books when travelling, say there’s no substitute for being able to handle a tangible object with covers, with a spine, with printed pages that can actually be fingered and turned. It’s a tactile pleasure worth cherishing – like stroking a cat.

What do writers think about e-books? As you’d expect, there’s some ambivalence. A recent online survey conducted for the Australian Society of Authors by a Macquarie University group (David Throsby et al.) probed authors’ opinions about the changing book industry, including e-booksA variety of views has emerged, of course, partly because authors’ experiences with e-books differ considerably according to the genre in question: sales in digital format tend to be higher for romance, travel, and ‘action’ stories than for literary fiction or young adult fiction. A shortage of reliable data complicates the picture, but many writers are troubled by the fact that the price of e-books keeps going down and therefore royalty returns are small except for self-published titles, where most of the income goes straight to the author.

IMG_3276

Of course I’m very glad my novels are available in e-book format for those who prefer that medium – just as I’m glad that a couple of them have also been turned into audiobooks.

Nevertheless I don’t mind confessing that I still regard the traditional printed version (whether of my own publications or of those by other authors) as the Real Thing.

Why is this?

Well, part of it may be just an attachment to long-established reading habits, but there are a few practical reasons that go beyond simple nostalgia.

  • Unlike a text that’s stored electronically, a physical book may be chanced upon among other books in a shop or library, picked up and browsed through. For me this has often led to serendipitous discoveries.
  • It may be appreciated for its material properties – its size and shape, its weight in your hand, the texture of the paper it’s printed on, the particular look and feel of a well-bound hardback cover and its dust-jacket garb.
  • It may be wrapped and presented as a gift. There could hardly be a similarly ceremonial transaction with an e-book.
  • It may be autographed by the author, perhaps with an accompanying personal inscription. In a previous post I wrote about the value attached to signed copies.
  • It may be annotated with a reader’s thoughts. Usually it’s irritating to open a library book and find someone’s far-from-discerning scribble in the margins; but in rare cases a previous reader’s comments can illuminate a passage, providing much the same interest as an intelligent conversational exchange.
  • It may be preserved because of its personal associations, e.g. a beloved school prize or a battered old textbook from student days.
  • It may be taken down occasionally from your shelf, re-read, and placed back in a different spot so that it rubs shoulders with a new set of literary companions.
  • It may be passed on to other readers as a loan or a present or a charitable donation. I buy a lot of books and don’t have room to keep them all, so in the past few years I’ve given away thousands of them – many to universities (including a special collection of rare items donated to the Flinders University Library) or to charity shops.
  • It may be handed down within a family. Recently Natasha Robinson wrote about this for The Weekend Australian – about how much she treasures certain books read to her as a child, which were never discarded:

My mother kept some of our childhood books. John Brown and the Midnight Cat was a favourite… Now I read that story to my children. The pages are tattered; more than a few are held together with sticky tape. But it’s a physical marker of a tradition, of a head resting in the nook of a mother’s arm after bath time, a time of absorption that is all too rare in this electronic world. Long may it live.

 

6 thoughts on “Is a book in the hand worth two in the ether?

  1. For the last few years almost all my reading has been on Kindle. I read a review and can have the book within a couple of minutes. But it also means that I’m poorly informed about recent books of Australian poetry. Watch out, Gleebooks, here I come!

  2. Thanks for the comment, Andrew.
    Yes, e-books may be convenient for most genres but those of us who like to read poetry are still reliant on shops that stock good old-fashioned slim volumes. Enviable to have Gleebooks on your doorstep now – Lucky you!

  3. I much prefer reading a physical book. I like knowing where I am by feel rather than information, and I like to flip back and reread. I like to feel the book in my hands, and even to feel that there is a tangible connection to the author, in a way that doesn’t quite feel the same in digital.

  4. Yes – and the flip side of being able to ‘flip back’ is that you can also look forward easily to see how much or little remains ahead. Knowing at a glance whether you’re halfway through the book or into its final chapter can make a big difference to how you interpret a passage – with a novel, especially. Harder to get this spatial sense of ‘where you are’ in a text if it’s on a screen. Thanks for your response, Iris.

  5. Ian,

    I make considerable use of a Kindle, but also still read physical books frequently. There are benefits to both.

    On the one hand the Kindle is easier to carry on the move, older titles which might be difficult to locate are more readily viable to re-publish, and typefaces can readily be enlarged (I’m starting to appreciate that one more, sadly). There are also distinct storage space advantages to an e-library, though that is probably of more interest to the eager reader’s housemates.

    On the other hand, there is a physical aspect to the reading experience to which you’ve alluded (I’ll confess to a fondness for the subtle aroma of ageing book), rather more scope for design and typography (particularly dear to my heart) in the physical object , and when all is said and done somehow it just seems the right way to read.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *